About N.A.C.C.

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far N.A.C.C. has created 232 blog entries.

“Housing Didn’t Solve Everything:” Perspectives of Housing and Long-Term Housing Outcomes of Participants in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Dr. Robert L. Fischer

Dr. Robert L. Fischer
Grace Longwell Coyle Professor in Civil Society
Director, Center on Poverty and Community Development
Chair, Master of Nonprofit Organizations Program
Jack, Joseph, and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences
Case Western Reserve University

“Housing Didn’t Solve Everything:” Perspectives of Housing and Long-Term Housing Outcomes of Participants in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Rong Bai, Cyleste C. Collins, David Cramptom, Robert Fischer
Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, February 2025

Family housing instability is closely linked to child welfare issues. This study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine the long-term housing outcomes and experiences of families in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and how insights from treatment group participants, their case workers, and child welfare workers help to explain those outcomes. The authors used county-level administrative data (n = 273) to explore and compare program participants’ housing stability two years before the RCT, during the RCT, and two years after the RCT concluded. They explored treatment group participants’ housing experiences through 36 in-depth interviews with service providers and treatment group participants.

The quantitative results indicated that the treatment group had somewhat more housing stability compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed the overarching themes of (1) Factors Supporting Housing Stability & Resilience; (2) Challenges to Housing Stability, and (3) Housing Didn’t Solve Everything. They conclude that, although obtaining housing is a necessary foundation for families working through child welfare cases, it is inadequate to ensure long-term housing stability. Practitioners and policymakers must advocate for and address critical issues related to facilitating families’ housing stability over the long-term.

Robert L. Fischer is the Grace Longwell Coyle Professor in Civil Society at the Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences of Case Western Reserve University, where he leads a range of evaluation research studies and teaches evaluation methods to graduate students in social work and nonprofit management. He is also Co-Director of the The Center on Poverty and Community Development. Since 2001, he has led the Center’s research on Invest in Children, a county-wide early childhood initiative that includes home visiting, children’s health, and childcare components. Dr. Fischer is also faculty director of the Master of Nonprofit Organizations (MNO) degree program.

By |2025-03-08T19:23:23-05:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

Feeding the Flock: The Role of the Revenue Portfolio in the Financial Growth of Congregations and Religious Organizations

Dr. Elizabeth A. M. Searing

Elizabeth A.M. Searing, PhD, CNP
Fellow, Venise Stuart Professorship in Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Associate Professor, University of Texas at Dallas
Adjunct Research Professor, Carleton University

Nathan Grasse

Nathan J. Grasse
Associate Professor
Master of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Leadership Program
Carleton University

R. Regina Cline
Visiting Professor
Merrilee Alexander Kick College of Business and Entrepreneurship
Texas Woman’s University

Feeding the Flock: The Role of the Revenue Portfolio in the Financial Growth of Congregations and Religious Organizations
Elizabeth A. M. Searing, Nathan J. Grasse, R. Regina Cline
Nonprofit Management & Leadership, February 2025
This work was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council

There have been fewer population-level studies of religious organization revenues compared to other nonprofit organizations. This discrepancy is likely due to the exemption of houses of worship from filing the U.S. Form 990, which is the basis for most nonprofit financial analysis in academic literature. Using granular financial data on over 30,000 religious organizations in Canada from 2009 to 2016, the authors explore the characteristics of the revenue portfolios for this under-studied subsector of tax-exempt organizations.

In addition to providing useful descriptive information, such as the differences between funding portfolios by religion or denomination, they identify characteristics associated with financial growth using dynamic difference-generalized method of moments estimations. They find that donations where receipts were given drive almost all portfolios, while revenues that comprise the portfolio fringe vary widely in form and importance for growth. This study yields information useful to practitioners and researchers interested in nonprofit finance and the financial management.

Dr. Elizabeth A. M. Searing is an Associate Professor of Public and Nonprofit Management at the University of Texas at Dallas. She is also an Adjunct research Professor at Carleton University, Canada. Dr. Searing’s primary research focus is the financial management of nonprofit and social enterprise organizations, but she also conducts work on comparative social economy more broadly. She is an Associate Editor and editorial board member of Nonprofit Management & Leadership, and an editorial advisory board member at VOLUNTAS and the Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management (JPBAFM). Her articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, and Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

Nathan J. Grasse is an Associate Professor in the Master of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership (MPNL) program at Carleton University. He is an associate editor at the Journal of Civil Society, a member of the editorial board of Public Administration Review, and a board member of the Nonprofit Academic Centers Council, and has published in journals such as Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Policy Studies Journal, and the Review of Public Personnel Administration. His academic focus primarily revolves around the governance and financial management of public-serving organizations.

R. Regina Cline is a visiting professor at Texas Woman’s University in the Merrilee Alexander Kick College of Business and Entrepreneurship’s Health Care Administration program. She is also a PhD candidate at the University of Texas at Dallas, completing her dissertation entitled “Equity and administrative burden in comparative race and immigration policy: A study of refugee experiences.” Regina’s professional background includes management positions in the field of substance abuse treatment. She also founded and directed Embracing Diversity, Inc, a 501(c)3 nonprofit in Florida and in Mississippi, starting in 2014. In addition, she is a public speaker, trainer, consultant, and community organizer.

By |2025-05-14T12:33:23-04:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

Professional in Residence / Director of Applied Research – INAR at LSUS

Position Title: Professional in Residence / Director of Applied Research
Organization: Institute for Nonprofit Administration and Research (INAR) at LSU Shreveport (LSUS)
Reports to: Executive Director of INAR
Employment Type: 9-month full-time position, Professional in Residence
FTE Split: 50% Teaching, 50% Director of Applied Research
Location: Shreveport, LA

Position Overview:
The Institute for Nonprofit Administration and Research (INAR) at LSUS seeks a knowledgeable, forward-thinking Professional in Residence who will also serve as the Director of Applied Research. Reporting to the Executive Director of INAR, this position combines research leadership with teaching, working to expand INAR’s research initiatives and impact across the region. This is non-tenure track position.

By |2025-01-29T11:17:39-05:00January 29th, 2025|Job Posting|

Executive Director of the Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Studies and Women’s Philanthropy Board

Position Overview

The Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Studies encompasses teaching, outreach, and research, thus supporting the tripartite mission of Auburn University. Its work focuses on philanthropy, wealth management, mentoring and nonprofit studies, serving a variety of students and other audiences in a real and virtual community. The Cary Center supports teaching and learning in the College of Human Sciences academic programs which focus on the art and science of philanthropy as applied to the nonprofit sector. The center provides mentoring for students, professionals, and communities in the areas of economic sustainability and philanthropy. The Cary Center includes three divisions: Community and Collegiate, Youth, and Adult, which includes the flagship program, The Women’s Philanthropy Board and the men’s auxiliary group, the Phils.

Job Summary

The Executive Director of the Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Studies and Women’s Philanthropy Board will have responsibility and oversight for the fiscal, human resources, external relations, public relations, fundraising/grantsmanship, educational, research, and programmatic (outreach) functions. This role drives fundraising to support programming and create new opportunities. This role is integral to advancing the mission of the College of Human Sciences through programming and initiatives of the Cary Center. This role will also include teaching responsibilities and may carry an assistant/associate clinical professor title. This a twelve-month nontenure track position. The candidate selected must be able to meet eligibility requirements to work in the United States at the time the appointment is scheduled to begin and continue working legally during employment.

By |2025-01-08T10:34:17-05:00January 8th, 2025|Job Posting|

A Message from Your Board President: December 2024

Angela R. Logan, PhD

Angela R. Logan, PhD
St. Andre Bessette Academic Director
Master of Nonprofit Administration

Associate Teaching Professor
Mendoza College of Business
University of Notre Dame

Hope > Despair

Hello! As I write this, I am reflecting on a recent experience and wrestling with a question I’ve been pondering for the past three weeks. At the beginning of December, led by an international nonprofit, I embarked upon a ten day pilgrimage with members of my church, to study the principles and practices of peacemaking within the context of the Emerald Isles. Over the course of the trip, we traveled across Ireland and Northern Ireland, meeting with everyone from Benedictine monks to former paramilitary soldiers on both sides of The Troubles, and everyone in between. We visited with nonprofit leaders committed to reclaiming the Irish language, toured a working replica of the 19th-century vessel that carried Irish emigrants to North America fleeing the Great Irish Famine, and the largest stadium of the Gaelic Athletic Association (I even tried a wee bit of hurling).

As I sit here, thinking back over my trip, one question keeps coming. I suspect for many of you, you are also wrestling with the answer to this question. The question is simply this: What is my role in all of this?

As we wrap up the academic term, questioning who assigned all these projects and papers (okay, maybe that’s just me), while also making preparations for the start of the new term shortly after the Times Square ball drops, it can often feel like we are living on a perpetual hamster wheel (again, maybe that’s just me). The administrivia keeps piling up, with budget preparations, midyear performance evaluations of staff, and preparing preliminary reports of institutional leadership. And let’s not forget the political uncertainty in the US and abroad, and the implications that uncertainty will no doubt have on our sector, our students, and ourselves… We’re being asked to increasingly do so much more with so much less, while also trying to maintain a robust research agenda and preparing the next generation of nonprofit leaders. Whew…are you as tired reading that as I was typing it?!, And don’t get me started on the pressures of parenting, parenting your parents, or both, dealing with the realities of aging well, and just generally maintaining your physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing! It’s enough to send an academic director to Jamaica (again, probably just me).

And yet, as I hold the tension between all the things on my to-do list and my experience on the pilgrimage to the Emerald Isles, I can’t help but be challenged to focus on the wider context of all of this, and ask myself: What is my role in all of this? In a world that often pushes us to choose between despair and hope, my role is to choose hope. And more importantly, my role, and dare I say our role, is to challenge our students to do the same.

Because wasn’t hope the genesis of the nonprofit and philanthropic sector? Prometheus stole fire from the gods to give humanity hope (in the form of light). The America that de Tocqueville saw was one in which the citizens of a new nation banded together to provide each other hope in spite of all that surrounded them. Social service agencies and schools were born in the United States to give hope to the formerly enslaved and recent immigrants who had every right to sink into despair. Generosity with the intention of understanding how to live in hope when the world seems to constantly push you towards despair.

Friends, as you slowly but methodically wrap up 2024, I encourage you to hold onto the hope. The hope will sustain us in the days to come, and will give us what we need to give our students what they need: the hope to foolishly believe they can, and will, make a difference in this world!

All the best,

Angela R. Logan
Board President, NACC

By |2024-12-18T07:28:13-05:00December 18th, 2024|President's Message|

Artificial Intelligence and Philanthropy: The Cybernetics of Philanthropy from 1974 to 2024

Dr. William M. Plater

Dr. William M. Plater
Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus of
Philanthropic Studies, Public Policy, and English

Indiana University Indianapolis

Dr. Genevieve Shaker

Dr. Genevieve Shaker
Donald A. Campbell Chair in Fundraising Leadership
Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy

Artificial Intelligence and Philanthropy: The Cybernetics of Philanthropy from 1974 to 2024
William M. Plater and Genevieve G. Shaker
Philanthropia, 2024

OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT, was founded as a nonprofit with a mission of ensuring that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. ChatGPT was therefore intended to advance the common good, sharing an underlying principle with philanthropy and the nonprofit organizations it supports. This was not the first association of machine learning with philanthropy, particularly in terms of algorithms designed for control versus those aimed at doing good. In 1974, a white paper by Heinz Von Foerster, a polymath scientist who happened to be president of an important foundation, considered the potential of computer-based feedback systems to improve “giving with a purpose.” A review of his paper served as the impetus for this essay, which explores the antecedents of contemporary predictions regarding the potential of AI to enhance the practice of philanthropy.

William M. Plater, PhD, is Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus of Philanthropic Studies, Public Policy, and English at Indiana University Indianapolis, where he also served Executive Vice Chancellor and Dean of the Faculties. He continues to be engaged with the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.

Genevieve G. Shaker, PhD, is the Donald A. Campbell Chair in Fundraising Leadership and Professor of Philanthropic Studies at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. Professor Shaker’s research focuses on fundraising and fundraisers, philanthropy education, and higher education advancement. Emerging research interests include the roles and practices of fundraisers around the world. She is the lead editor of the fifth edition of Achieving Excellence in Fundraising (2022), a key educational resource for the field.

By |2024-12-05T15:03:43-05:00December 5th, 2024|NACC Member Research|

Race in Integrated Data Systems: Why, Wherefrom, and How

Dr. Robert L. Fischer

Dr. Robert L. Fischer
Grace Longwell Coyle Professor in Civil Society
Jack, Joseph, & Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences
Director, Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development
Case Western Reserve University

Race in Integrated Data Systems: Why, Wherefrom, and How
Stephen Steh, Francisca Richter, Robert Fischer, Meagan Ray-Novak, Michael Henderson
International Journal of Population Data Science, 2024

Integrated administrative data systems (IADs) are a powerful resource to implement research and analysis for social policy. While IADs may capture racial identity data from multiple administrative sources, there is no agreed upon criteria for whether and how to synthesize this information in a way that (1) produces knowledge to advance racial equity, while (2) underscoring race as a social construct. This study leverages a county-level IAD to test and analyze an event-table design to represent racial identity that, when informed with historical and community knowledge, may meet both of the aforementioned goals.

The authors illustrate this approach applied to the development of a registry of youth experiencing homelessness, as captured by linked administrative data from vital records, homeless service agencies, schools, food support programs, and other systems. The event table design includes race identity for each person in the registry across all systems included. They develop criteria to inform the hierarchy of one source over another when there are discrepancies in race identity across systems, and when categories for this variable differ across administrative systems. They provide historical and social context behind potential discrepancies and discuss approaches to missing data. Furthermore, they highlight the value of including qualitative knowledge from agency data managers, users, and those represented in the data to inform the synthesis of information around race. Finally, they illustrate how this approach can guide research analysis and contextualize results, thus enhancing the research process and advancing racial equity with IADs.

Robert L. Fischer joined the Mandel School in 2001 as a senior research associate, became an associate professor in the tenure track in 2017, tenured in 2020, and full professor in 2024. He has authored more than 60 peer-reviewed publications and generated more than $15 million in extramural grant funding as principal or co-principal investigator. Dr. Fischer has served as director of the MNO program since 2012 and teaches two courses in the program. He is the lead full-time faculty member teaching in the MNO degree program, and led the work to it being in the inaugural cohort of accredited nonprofit masters programs in 2019.

Additionally, Dr. Fischer served as co-director of the Center on Poverty and Community Development since 2005 and as director since 2022. He has also been an active member of the school’s steering committee, curriculum committee, budget committee, library committee and has served as chair of a standing committee on the faculty senate. He currently serves on the board of trustees of both the St. Lukes Foundation and the Woodruff Foundation in Cleveland. Dr. Fischer has been a generous institution-builder at the Mandel School and CWRU and a frequent contributor to the academy.

By |2024-12-05T15:03:02-05:00December 5th, 2024|NACC Member Research|

Impacts of Zero-Fare Transit Policy on Health and Social Determinants: Protocol for a Natural Experiment Study

Brent Never

Brent Never
Associate Dean, Associate Professor of Public Affairs
Director, Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership
Henry W. Bloch School of Management
University of Missouri-Kansas City

Impacts of Zero-Fare Transit Policy on Health and Social Determinants: Protocol for a Natural Experiment Study
Amanda Grimes, Jannette Berkley-Patton, Jenifer E. Allsworth, Joseph S. Lightner, Keith Feldman, Brent Never, Betty M. Drees, Brian E. Saelens, Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley, Lauren Fitzpatrick, Carole Bowe Thompson, Madison Pilla, Kacee Ross, Chelsea Steel, Emily Cramer, Eric Rogers, Cindy Baker, Jordan A. Carlson
Frontiers in Public Health, 2024

Population-level efforts are needed to increase levels of physical activity and healthy eating to reduce and manage chronic diseases such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. Interventions to increase public transit use may be one promising strategy, particularly for low-income communities or populations of color who are disproportionately burdened by health disparities and transportation barriers. This study, supported by an NIH grant, employs a natural experiment design to evaluate the impacts of a citywide zero-fare transit policy in Kansas City, Missouri, on ridership and health indicators.

In Aim 1, comparison to 9 similar cities without zero-fare transit is used to examine differential changes in ridership from 3 years before to 4 years after the adoption of zero-fare. In Aim 2, Kansas City residents are being recruited from a large safety net health system to compare health indicators between zero-fare riders and non-riders.

Longitudinal data on BMI, cardiometabolic markers, and economic barriers to health are collected from the electronic health record from 2017 to 2024. Cross-sectional data on healthy eating and device-measured physical activity are collected from a subsample of participants as part of the study procedures (N = 360). Numerous baseline characteristics are collected to account for differences between Kansas City and comparison city bus routes (Aim 1) and between zero-fare riders and non-riders within Kansas City (Aim 2). Evidence on how zero-fare transit shapes population health through mechanisms related to improved economic factors, transportation, physical activity, and healthy eating among low-income groups is expected.

Brent Never (Ph.D., Indiana University) is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the Henry W. Bloch School of Management. His research considers the spatial and geographic implications of a decentralized human service system. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and spatial regression methods, he has worked to identify communities underserved by human services. He has also worked to highlight clusters of financially distressed nonprofit organizations, those most likely to go out of business in the near future raising the question as to who is served by financially ‘sick’ human service providers.

Never has served as Visiting Professor in the School of Community Resources & Development at Arizona State University where he conducted research on the continued devolution of human services from government provision to private-sector provision through contracts, vouchers, and grants. He has published in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, Voluntas, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, and Nonprofit Policy Forum. In addition, Never regularly writes for the practitioner audience in the Nonprofit Quarterly.

By |2024-12-05T15:02:10-05:00December 5th, 2024|NACC Member Research|

Critical Praxis and the Social Imaginary for Sustainable Food Systems

Dr. Max O. Stephenson, Jr.

Dr. Max O. Stephenson, Jr.
Professor, Public and International Affairs and
Director, Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance
College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences
Virginia Tech

Critical Praxis and the Social Imaginary for Sustainable Food Systems
Max Stephenson Jr, Kim Niewolny, Laura Zanotti, Anna Erwin
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2024

This article serves as the introduction and overview for a 14-article special issue of the academic journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems entitled “Critical Praxis and the Social Imaginary for Sustainable Food Systems.” According to the authors, Freire’s (1972) concept of critical praxis offers an illuminating frame to reconsider and reframe the epistemological and ontological assumptions and thinking that shape the current food system. His conceptual framework offers analysts a way to approach processes and practices dynamically; that is, in a fashion in which they are not only enacted, but also continuously theorized, evaluated, and reimagined as they evolve. The iterative character of that process highlights the importance of understanding the active operation of power and its implications for individual and collective agency. More importantly, it moves scholars beyond efforts to capture “what is happening” and toward identifying generative ways that interested stakeholders may participate actively in the creation of more just and sustainable food systems.

In the author’s view, this special issue of Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems resulted in a fruitful set of responses to this overarching challenge. As a group, these articles critically engage with various relevant onto-epistemic questions and frameworks. These include, among others, agroecology, regenerative agriculture, Black agrarianism, radical pragmatism, decolonizing strategies, and urban ecology. Collectively, these analyses question the dominant thinking in which today’s food systems are entrenched and highlight perspectives that can help to disrupt the dominant meta-narrative that is today driven foremost by efficiency and technology claims, and to explore policy interventions, justice centered strategies, community-engaged collaborative efforts, and the deep reflexivity that can reveal alternate ways of thinking. The analyses collected here call on food system scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to work actively toward realizing a future in which such structures and processes are ecologically and socially sustainable and equitable for all.

Dr. Max O. Stephenson, Jr. serves as a professor in the Virginia Tech School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA). With a distinguished career in public policy, civil society studies and public administration, he also serves as the Director of the Institute for Policy and Governance in Virginia Tech’s College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences. He holds a Ph.D. in Government and Foreign Affairs from the University of Virginia. Dr. Stephenson’s research interests include civil society, democratic governance and political agency, and social equity and social change, reflected in his extensive publication record and numerous academic contributions. He is recognized for his interdisciplinary approach, integrating constructs from political science, public administration, and community development to address complex social challenges.

By |2024-12-05T15:01:48-05:00December 5th, 2024|NACC Member Research|

Community Representation, COVID-19, and the Challenges of Shifting Grantmaking Power: How a Public LGBTQ+ Foundation Weighed the Options

Elizabeth Dale

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D.
Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy
Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy
Grand Valley State University

Community Representation, COVID-19, and the Challenges of Shifting Grantmaking Power: How a Public LGBTQ+ Foundation Weighed the Options
Elizabeth J. Dale and Katie Carter
Georgetown University Press, 2024

This chapter, featured in Participatory Grantmaking in Philanthropy: How Democratizing Decision-Making Shifts Power to Communities, discusses how Pride Foundation, a public foundation serving the LGBTQ+ community, rethought its Community Grants Program as part of a broader institutional commitment to racial equity. It details what the transition away from a traditional, application-based grantmaking model looked like in real time during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and raises important questions for other foundations to answer when aligning their grantmaking with an equity lens. One of those questions is: Under what circumstances should established foundations explore and adopt alternative approaches to grantmaking such as participatory grantmaking and trust-based philanthropy? This chapter discusses how Pride Foundation ultimately adopted a trust-based philanthropy approach, which centers mutually accountable relationships between funders and grantees and shifts power away from funders to consider grantees’ needs.

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D., joined the Johnson Center in September 2024 as the second holder of the Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy, the world’s first endowed chair for family philanthropy. She previously held a faculty position and directed the Nonprofit Leadership Program at Seattle University and was the Visiting Eileen Lamb O’Gara Fellow in Women’s Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Dr. Dale has authored or co-authored more than 20 publications and reports for both scholarly and practitioner audiences, which have been published in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, Voluntary Sector Review, The Foundation Review, Philanthropy and Education, and several prominent edited volumes. Her scholarship has focused on social justice philanthropy, women’s giving and giving to women’s and girls’ causes, LGBTQ+ philanthropy, and couples’ charitable giving, as well as gender and the fundraising profession. Ultimately, Dr. Dale seeks to understand the power and potential of philanthropy, the role of identity in giving, and the role of philanthropy in contributing to a more just, equitable, and inclusive society.

By |2024-12-05T14:57:56-05:00December 5th, 2024|NACC Member Research|
Go to Top