About N.A.C.C.

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far N.A.C.C. has created 236 blog entries.

NACC Welcomes Newest Member: The Askew School of Public Administration, Florida State University

David Berlan

David Berlan, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Askew School of Public Administration
College of Social Sciences and Public Policy
Florida State University

The Nonprofit Academic Centers Council (NACC) is pleased to welcome the Reubin O’D. Askew School of Public Administration and Policy at Florida State University as its newest member. As part of NACC’s international network of leading academic centers focused on nonprofit management, philanthropy, and voluntary action, the Askew School joins a distinguished community dedicated to advancing research, education, and leadership in the nonprofit sector.

Founded in 1947, the Askew School is one of the oldest public administration programs in the United States and is recognized for its top-ranked master’s degree in public administration in Florida. The school emphasizes ethical leadership and integrates theory with practice to prepare students for impactful careers in public and nonprofit management. With a highly regarded faculty known for both their scholarly contributions and practical experience, the Askew School offers diverse specializations, including nonprofit management, evidence-based policymaking, and emergency management. Its location in Tallahassee, a hub of policy innovation, further enriches the learning experience.

We also extend a warm welcome to Dr. David Berlan, who will serve as the NACC Member Representative for the Askew School. An associate professor with expertise in nonprofit management and financial management, Dr. Berlan’s research focuses on the evolution of nonprofit organizations and their networks, particularly within global health and development contexts. His insights and leadership will undoubtedly strengthen our community.

We are delighted to have the Askew School and Dr. Berlan join NACC and look forward to their contributions in advancing knowledge and practice in the nonprofit sector.

By |2025-03-08T19:54:04-05:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Announcement|

Spend-Down Strategies, Democracy Funding, and the Future of Philanthropy

Elizabeth Dale

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D.
Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy
Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy
Grand Valley State University

“More Foundations Opt for Planned Lifespans and Spend-Down Strategies”
and “The Movement to Fund Democracy is Learning Important Lessons”

Two Chapters in 11 Trends in Philanthropy for 2025
Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D.
Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy, January 2025

Elizabeth J. Dale’s contributions to the Johnson Center for Philanthropy’s 11 Trends in Philanthropy for 2025 provide timely insights into the evolving landscape of philanthropy.

Her first chapter, “More Foundations Opt for Planned Lifespans and Spend-Down Strategies” explores the growing trend of foundations deciding on a strategic spend down, highlighting how prominent figures like Warren Buffett are reshaping the norms of perpetual giving. By examining both limited-life and spend-down foundations, Dale discusses the implications of accelerated grantmaking on philanthropic impact and strategy, noting how these approaches challenge traditional endowment models.

In her second chapter, “The Movement to Fund Democracy is Learning Important Lessons,” Dale analyzes the rising investments in democracy-related funding, particularly in response to increasing concerns about election integrity and polarization in the United States. She traces the surge in grants supporting voting rights, informed citizenry, and civil discourse since the 2016 election cycle, emphasizing the challenges and opportunities facing funders in this critical area. Dale’s analysis not only addresses the complexities of funding democracy efforts but also raises essential questions about philanthropy’s role in safeguarding civil society.

Together, these chapters reflect the overarching themes of 11 Trends in Philanthropy for 2025, which examines the sector’s response to societal challenges, the evolving role of funders, and the strategies shaping the future of philanthropy. Dale’s contributions add depth to the volume’s exploration of how philanthropic practices can adapt to meet urgent demands for equity and democratic integrity.

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D., joined the Johnson Center in September 2024 as the second holder of the Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy, the world’s first endowed chair for family philanthropy. She previously held a faculty position and directed the Nonprofit Leadership Program at Seattle University and was the Visiting Eileen Lamb O’Gara Fellow in Women’s Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Dr. Dale has authored or co-authored more than 20 publications and reports for both scholarly and practitioner audiences, which have been published in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, Voluntary Sector Review, The Foundation Review, Philanthropy and Education, and several prominent edited volumes. Her scholarship has focused on social justice philanthropy, women’s giving and giving to women’s and girls’ causes, LGBTQ+ philanthropy, and couples’ charitable giving, as well as gender and the fundraising profession. Ultimately, Dr. Dale seeks to understand the power and potential of philanthropy, the role of identity in giving, and the role of philanthropy in contributing to a more just, equitable, and inclusive society.

By |2025-03-09T14:41:39-04:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

Adopting Community-Centric Fundraising: Findings from a National Study

Elizabeth Dale

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D.
Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy
Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy
Grand Valley State University

Maya Hemachandra, M.P.A.

Maya Hemachandra, M.P.A.
Adjunct Faculty
Nonprofit Leadership
Seattle University

Adopting Community-Centric Fundraising
Findings from a National Study
Elizabeth J. Dale and Maya Hemachandra
Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy, February 2025

This national study examines the adoption of Community-Centric Fundraising (CCF) practices across U.S. nonprofit organizations. Proposed in 2019, CCF is a set of principles developed by people of color to align fundraising with movements for race, equity, and social justice. Based on survey responses from 283 organizations and in-depth interviews with 14 fundraising professionals, the research revealed both promising developments and persistent challenges in transforming established fundraising approaches.

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D., joined the Johnson Center in September 2024 as the second holder of the Frey Foundation Chair for Family Philanthropy, the world’s first endowed chair for family philanthropy. She previously held a faculty position and directed the Nonprofit Leadership Program at Seattle University and was the Visiting Eileen Lamb O’Gara Fellow in Women’s Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Dr. Dale has authored or co-authored more than 20 publications and reports for both scholarly and practitioner audiences, which have been published in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, Voluntary Sector Review, The Foundation Review, Philanthropy and Education, and several prominent edited volumes. Her scholarship has focused on social justice philanthropy, women’s giving and giving to women’s and girls’ causes, LGBTQ+ philanthropy, and couples’ charitable giving, as well as gender and the fundraising profession. Ultimately, Dr. Dale seeks to understand the power and potential of philanthropy, the role of identity in giving, and the role of philanthropy in contributing to a more just, equitable, and inclusive society.

Maya Hemachandra’s mission is to create champions for social change. Her approach blends philanthropy, strategy, and compassion to engage individuals and organizations in addressing poverty and oppression in the Pacific Northwest. Over her 20-year career, she has raised millions of dollars in philanthropic and volunteer support for human service and social justice organizations. She is the owner of Sambar Nonprofit Solutions where she helps nonprofit organizations align policies and practices with their anti-racist values. She holds an M.P.A. from the University of Washington’s Evans School of Public Policy and Governance and a Certified Fundraising Executive (CFRE) designation.

By |2025-03-09T14:39:43-04:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

“Magic Concepts” and USAID: Framing Food Systems Reform to Support the Status Quo

Lia Kelinsky-Jones

Lia Kelinsky-Jones
Research Assistant Professor
Center for Food Systems and Community Transformation
Virginia Tech

Dr. Kim L. Niewolny
Professor, Department of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education
Founding Director, Center for Food Systems and Community Transformation
Virginia Tech

Dr. Max O. Stephenson, Jr.

Dr. Max O. Stephenson, Jr.
Professor, Public and International Affairs
Founding Director, Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance
Virginia Tech

“Magic Concepts” and USAID: Framing Food Systems Reform to Support the Status Quo
Lia R. Kelinsky‐Jones, Kim L. Niewolny, Max O. Stephenson Jr.
Development Policy Review, January 2025

The future of agricultural policy is increasingly a subject of debate within international development as many civil society organizations actively engage with alternative production and delivery frameworks that challenge the prevailing neoliberal food system. Meanwhile, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) embraced what it termed “self-reliance” in its food systems policy framework in 2018. This article employed critical discourse analysis (CDA) to explore how the agency employed the construct in that statement and other documents published between 2018 and 2020. We also explored how focus groups comprised of US university food system scholar-practitioners with projects funded by USAID perceived our findings concerning the agency’s policy turn.

Overall, we found that USAID’s concept of self-reliance simultaneously de facto supported the continuation and even deepening of existing policy and processes while, at least formally, also embracing local community self-reliance, and therefore, experimentation. Our analysis of the agency’s policy rhetoric revealed that those efforts depicted market actors as active leaders while assigning local government representatives passive roles. For their part, our focus group respondents agreed on the vital importance of local responses to effective development outcomes, but differed in their estimation of the relative primacy USAID was assigning local market actors and organizations in that process.

Our analysis has three major policy implications. First, the primacy of the neoliberal conception of self-reliance in USAID initiatives continues to limit the possibility of self-directed development in targeted countries. Second, U.S. government efforts to frame self-reliance as principally a market-driven process is likely to deepen existing food system dynamics. Finally, this turn in USAID policy is at odds with the efforts of many civil society organizations across the globe now pursuing alternate paths to agricultural system reform.

Dr. Lia Kelinsky-Jones is an interdisciplinary social scientist whose integrated research, teaching, and community development work focuses on sustainable and resilient food systems using an agroecological lens. She advances this work via two primary domains: 1) praxis including the role of university-based community development, engagement, and education in advancing agroecology and resilience; 2) policy including how collaborative and participatory governance approaches shape regional and local food systems and resilience. Most recently, she served as a Civic Science Fellow at Johns Hopkins University’s Agora Institute where she investigated university-based sustainability policy engagement. She has more than a decade of experience in university engagement, international development, intercultural learning, and program development. Dr. Kelinsky-Jones grew up in five different countries and speaks both Spanish and French in addition to her native English. She is an avid gardener of both food and flowers and enjoys road and mountain biking and crafting pottery.

Kim Niewolny is Professor in the Department of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education and serves as the founding director of the Center for Food Systems and Community Transformation at Virginia Tech. Since 2009, Kim’s research, teaching, and extension programming has emphasized the role of power and praxis in food systems–based community development from an interdisciplinary and critical social theory perspective. As a scholar-practitioner, Kim focuses on the interface of sustainable food systems and the praxis of community food work from classroom to community spaces at the local, regional, and global level. Her research training and experience in qualitative research methods with special interest in discourse analysis and narrative inquiry. Currently funded initiatives include urban agriculture and sustainable food systems; farmworker food, health and wellness; the “Stories of Community Food Work initiative” and more. Kim teaches graduate courses and provides teaching leadership in Virginia Tech’s undergraduate Pathway minor, Food Agriculture, and Society. She has previously served as President for the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society and has been a board member of the Virginia Food Systems Council since 2018. At the Center, her focus is on supporting research, outreach, and education that generates and promotes creative possibilities for food systems that are abundant and resilient so that all may thrive.

Max Stephenson, Jr. serves as a Professor of Public and International Affairs in the Virginia Tech School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA). He also serves as Director of the Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance. Dr. Stephenson’s research interests include civil society, democratic governance and political agency, and social equity and social change. He is widely recognized for his interdisciplinary approach, integrating constructs from political science, public administration, and community development to address complex social challenges in diverse policy domains. He is the author or editor of 14 books, more than 100 articles and book chapters and more than 400 commentaries on the changing contours of United States policy and politics for democratic possibility in the U.S. and abroad.

By |2025-03-08T19:32:22-05:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

“Housing Didn’t Solve Everything:” Perspectives of Housing and Long-Term Housing Outcomes of Participants in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Dr. Robert L. Fischer

Dr. Robert L. Fischer
Grace Longwell Coyle Professor in Civil Society
Director, Center on Poverty and Community Development
Chair, Master of Nonprofit Organizations Program
Jack, Joseph, and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences
Case Western Reserve University

“Housing Didn’t Solve Everything:” Perspectives of Housing and Long-Term Housing Outcomes of Participants in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Rong Bai, Cyleste C. Collins, David Cramptom, Robert Fischer
Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, February 2025

Family housing instability is closely linked to child welfare issues. This study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine the long-term housing outcomes and experiences of families in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and how insights from treatment group participants, their case workers, and child welfare workers help to explain those outcomes. The authors used county-level administrative data (n = 273) to explore and compare program participants’ housing stability two years before the RCT, during the RCT, and two years after the RCT concluded. They explored treatment group participants’ housing experiences through 36 in-depth interviews with service providers and treatment group participants.

The quantitative results indicated that the treatment group had somewhat more housing stability compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed the overarching themes of (1) Factors Supporting Housing Stability & Resilience; (2) Challenges to Housing Stability, and (3) Housing Didn’t Solve Everything. They conclude that, although obtaining housing is a necessary foundation for families working through child welfare cases, it is inadequate to ensure long-term housing stability. Practitioners and policymakers must advocate for and address critical issues related to facilitating families’ housing stability over the long-term.

Robert L. Fischer is the Grace Longwell Coyle Professor in Civil Society at the Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences of Case Western Reserve University, where he leads a range of evaluation research studies and teaches evaluation methods to graduate students in social work and nonprofit management. He is also Co-Director of the The Center on Poverty and Community Development. Since 2001, he has led the Center’s research on Invest in Children, a county-wide early childhood initiative that includes home visiting, children’s health, and childcare components. Dr. Fischer is also faculty director of the Master of Nonprofit Organizations (MNO) degree program.

By |2025-03-08T19:23:23-05:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

Feeding the Flock: The Role of the Revenue Portfolio in the Financial Growth of Congregations and Religious Organizations

Dr. Elizabeth A. M. Searing

Elizabeth A.M. Searing, PhD, CNP
Fellow, Venise Stuart Professorship in Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Associate Professor, University of Texas at Dallas
Adjunct Research Professor, Carleton University

Nathan Grasse

Nathan J. Grasse
Associate Professor
Master of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Leadership Program
Carleton University

R. Regina Cline
Visiting Professor
Merrilee Alexander Kick College of Business and Entrepreneurship
Texas Woman’s University

Feeding the Flock: The Role of the Revenue Portfolio in the Financial Growth of Congregations and Religious Organizations
Elizabeth A. M. Searing, Nathan J. Grasse, R. Regina Cline
Nonprofit Management & Leadership, February 2025
This work was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council

There have been fewer population-level studies of religious organization revenues compared to other nonprofit organizations. This discrepancy is likely due to the exemption of houses of worship from filing the U.S. Form 990, which is the basis for most nonprofit financial analysis in academic literature. Using granular financial data on over 30,000 religious organizations in Canada from 2009 to 2016, the authors explore the characteristics of the revenue portfolios for this under-studied subsector of tax-exempt organizations.

In addition to providing useful descriptive information, such as the differences between funding portfolios by religion or denomination, they identify characteristics associated with financial growth using dynamic difference-generalized method of moments estimations. They find that donations where receipts were given drive almost all portfolios, while revenues that comprise the portfolio fringe vary widely in form and importance for growth. This study yields information useful to practitioners and researchers interested in nonprofit finance and the financial management.

Dr. Elizabeth A. M. Searing is an Associate Professor of Public and Nonprofit Management at the University of Texas at Dallas. She is also an Adjunct research Professor at Carleton University, Canada. Dr. Searing’s primary research focus is the financial management of nonprofit and social enterprise organizations, but she also conducts work on comparative social economy more broadly. She is an Associate Editor and editorial board member of Nonprofit Management & Leadership, and an editorial advisory board member at VOLUNTAS and the Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management (JPBAFM). Her articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, and Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

Nathan J. Grasse is an Associate Professor in the Master of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership (MPNL) program at Carleton University. He is an associate editor at the Journal of Civil Society, a member of the editorial board of Public Administration Review, and a board member of the Nonprofit Academic Centers Council, and has published in journals such as Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Policy Studies Journal, and the Review of Public Personnel Administration. His academic focus primarily revolves around the governance and financial management of public-serving organizations.

R. Regina Cline is a visiting professor at Texas Woman’s University in the Merrilee Alexander Kick College of Business and Entrepreneurship’s Health Care Administration program. She is also a PhD candidate at the University of Texas at Dallas, completing her dissertation entitled “Equity and administrative burden in comparative race and immigration policy: A study of refugee experiences.” Regina’s professional background includes management positions in the field of substance abuse treatment. She also founded and directed Embracing Diversity, Inc, a 501(c)3 nonprofit in Florida and in Mississippi, starting in 2014. In addition, she is a public speaker, trainer, consultant, and community organizer.

By |2025-05-14T12:33:23-04:00March 8th, 2025|NACC Member Research|

Professional in Residence / Director of Applied Research – INAR at LSUS

Position Title: Professional in Residence / Director of Applied Research
Organization: Institute for Nonprofit Administration and Research (INAR) at LSU Shreveport (LSUS)
Reports to: Executive Director of INAR
Employment Type: 9-month full-time position, Professional in Residence
FTE Split: 50% Teaching, 50% Director of Applied Research
Location: Shreveport, LA

Position Overview:
The Institute for Nonprofit Administration and Research (INAR) at LSUS seeks a knowledgeable, forward-thinking Professional in Residence who will also serve as the Director of Applied Research. Reporting to the Executive Director of INAR, this position combines research leadership with teaching, working to expand INAR’s research initiatives and impact across the region. This is non-tenure track position.

By |2025-01-29T11:17:39-05:00January 29th, 2025|Job Posting|

Executive Director of the Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Studies and Women’s Philanthropy Board

Position Overview

The Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Studies encompasses teaching, outreach, and research, thus supporting the tripartite mission of Auburn University. Its work focuses on philanthropy, wealth management, mentoring and nonprofit studies, serving a variety of students and other audiences in a real and virtual community. The Cary Center supports teaching and learning in the College of Human Sciences academic programs which focus on the art and science of philanthropy as applied to the nonprofit sector. The center provides mentoring for students, professionals, and communities in the areas of economic sustainability and philanthropy. The Cary Center includes three divisions: Community and Collegiate, Youth, and Adult, which includes the flagship program, The Women’s Philanthropy Board and the men’s auxiliary group, the Phils.

Job Summary

The Executive Director of the Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy & Nonprofit Studies and Women’s Philanthropy Board will have responsibility and oversight for the fiscal, human resources, external relations, public relations, fundraising/grantsmanship, educational, research, and programmatic (outreach) functions. This role drives fundraising to support programming and create new opportunities. This role is integral to advancing the mission of the College of Human Sciences through programming and initiatives of the Cary Center. This role will also include teaching responsibilities and may carry an assistant/associate clinical professor title. This a twelve-month nontenure track position. The candidate selected must be able to meet eligibility requirements to work in the United States at the time the appointment is scheduled to begin and continue working legally during employment.

By |2025-01-08T10:34:17-05:00January 8th, 2025|Job Posting|

A Message from Your Board President: December 2024

Angela R. Logan, PhD

Angela R. Logan, PhD
St. Andre Bessette Academic Director
Master of Nonprofit Administration

Associate Teaching Professor
Mendoza College of Business
University of Notre Dame

Hope > Despair

Hello! As I write this, I am reflecting on a recent experience and wrestling with a question I’ve been pondering for the past three weeks. At the beginning of December, led by an international nonprofit, I embarked upon a ten day pilgrimage with members of my church, to study the principles and practices of peacemaking within the context of the Emerald Isles. Over the course of the trip, we traveled across Ireland and Northern Ireland, meeting with everyone from Benedictine monks to former paramilitary soldiers on both sides of The Troubles, and everyone in between. We visited with nonprofit leaders committed to reclaiming the Irish language, toured a working replica of the 19th-century vessel that carried Irish emigrants to North America fleeing the Great Irish Famine, and the largest stadium of the Gaelic Athletic Association (I even tried a wee bit of hurling).

As I sit here, thinking back over my trip, one question keeps coming. I suspect for many of you, you are also wrestling with the answer to this question. The question is simply this: What is my role in all of this?

As we wrap up the academic term, questioning who assigned all these projects and papers (okay, maybe that’s just me), while also making preparations for the start of the new term shortly after the Times Square ball drops, it can often feel like we are living on a perpetual hamster wheel (again, maybe that’s just me). The administrivia keeps piling up, with budget preparations, midyear performance evaluations of staff, and preparing preliminary reports of institutional leadership. And let’s not forget the political uncertainty in the US and abroad, and the implications that uncertainty will no doubt have on our sector, our students, and ourselves… We’re being asked to increasingly do so much more with so much less, while also trying to maintain a robust research agenda and preparing the next generation of nonprofit leaders. Whew…are you as tired reading that as I was typing it?!, And don’t get me started on the pressures of parenting, parenting your parents, or both, dealing with the realities of aging well, and just generally maintaining your physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing! It’s enough to send an academic director to Jamaica (again, probably just me).

And yet, as I hold the tension between all the things on my to-do list and my experience on the pilgrimage to the Emerald Isles, I can’t help but be challenged to focus on the wider context of all of this, and ask myself: What is my role in all of this? In a world that often pushes us to choose between despair and hope, my role is to choose hope. And more importantly, my role, and dare I say our role, is to challenge our students to do the same.

Because wasn’t hope the genesis of the nonprofit and philanthropic sector? Prometheus stole fire from the gods to give humanity hope (in the form of light). The America that de Tocqueville saw was one in which the citizens of a new nation banded together to provide each other hope in spite of all that surrounded them. Social service agencies and schools were born in the United States to give hope to the formerly enslaved and recent immigrants who had every right to sink into despair. Generosity with the intention of understanding how to live in hope when the world seems to constantly push you towards despair.

Friends, as you slowly but methodically wrap up 2024, I encourage you to hold onto the hope. The hope will sustain us in the days to come, and will give us what we need to give our students what they need: the hope to foolishly believe they can, and will, make a difference in this world!

All the best,

Angela R. Logan
Board President, NACC

By |2024-12-18T07:28:13-05:00December 18th, 2024|President's Message|

Artificial Intelligence and Philanthropy: The Cybernetics of Philanthropy from 1974 to 2024

Dr. William M. Plater

Dr. William M. Plater
Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus of
Philanthropic Studies, Public Policy, and English

Indiana University Indianapolis

Dr. Genevieve Shaker

Dr. Genevieve Shaker
Donald A. Campbell Chair in Fundraising Leadership
Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy

Artificial Intelligence and Philanthropy: The Cybernetics of Philanthropy from 1974 to 2024
William M. Plater and Genevieve G. Shaker
Philanthropia, 2024

OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT, was founded as a nonprofit with a mission of ensuring that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. ChatGPT was therefore intended to advance the common good, sharing an underlying principle with philanthropy and the nonprofit organizations it supports. This was not the first association of machine learning with philanthropy, particularly in terms of algorithms designed for control versus those aimed at doing good. In 1974, a white paper by Heinz Von Foerster, a polymath scientist who happened to be president of an important foundation, considered the potential of computer-based feedback systems to improve “giving with a purpose.” A review of his paper served as the impetus for this essay, which explores the antecedents of contemporary predictions regarding the potential of AI to enhance the practice of philanthropy.

William M. Plater, PhD, is Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus of Philanthropic Studies, Public Policy, and English at Indiana University Indianapolis, where he also served Executive Vice Chancellor and Dean of the Faculties. He continues to be engaged with the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.

Genevieve G. Shaker, PhD, is the Donald A. Campbell Chair in Fundraising Leadership and Professor of Philanthropic Studies at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. Professor Shaker’s research focuses on fundraising and fundraisers, philanthropy education, and higher education advancement. Emerging research interests include the roles and practices of fundraisers around the world. She is the lead editor of the fifth edition of Achieving Excellence in Fundraising (2022), a key educational resource for the field.

By |2024-12-05T15:03:43-05:00December 5th, 2024|NACC Member Research|
Go to Top