Need a new search?

If you didn't find what you were looking for, try a new search!

Handbook of Critical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action

Roseanne M. Mirabella, PhD

Roseanne M. Mirabella, PhD
Associate Professor
College of Business and Public Management
Kean University

Angela M. Eikenberry

Angela M. Eikenberry, PhD
Professor and School Director
School of Public Policy
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
University of Connecticut

Angela R. Logan, PhD

Angela R. Logan, PhD
NACC President
St. Andre Bessette Academic Director
Master of Nonprofit Administration
Associate Teaching Professor
Mendoza College of Business
University of Notre Dame

Heather Carpenter, PhD

Heather Carpenter, PhD
Executive Director
Institute for Nonprofit Administration & Research

Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences
Louisiana State University Shreveport

Elizabeth J. Dale, PhD

Elizabeth J. Dale, PhD
Director and Associate Professor
Nonprofit Leadership
Seattle University

Kate Prendella

Katherine Prendella
Doctoral Student
School of Communication and Information
Rutgers-New Brunswick

Handbook of Critical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action: Concepts, Applications, and Future Directions
Eds. Roseanne M. Mirabella (Kean University, US), Tracey M. Coule (Sheffield Hallam University, UK), and Angela M. Eikenberry (University of Connecticut, US)
Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024

In August 2024, Edward Elgar Publishing released the Handbook of Critical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action, edited by Roseanne M. Mirabella (Kean University) and Angela M. Eikenberry (University of  Connecticut), alongside numerous contributors, including NACC member representatives Angela R. Logan (NACC President), Heather Carpenter, and Elizabeth J. Dale. (For a full list of editors and contributors, click here).

This insightful Handbook brings together leading and emerging scholars within the field of nonprofit organization, serving as a call to action for academics to interrogate key contemporary issues such as backsliding and authoritarianism. It meticulously distinguishes traditional, often marginalist perspectives from nuanced counterarguments to balance out the field.

The Handbook of Critical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action illustrates opportunities and challenges for future researchers within the sector and presses the reader to imagine a better, more equitable future. Chapters employ a variety of vital theoretical lenses, for example utilizing postcolonial theory, critical feminist theory, queer theory, critical disability theory and post-structural theory. They provide a timely, inter-contextual narration of the many roles enacted by nonprofit and voluntary organizations today.

Approaching nonprofit organizing as an ever-expanding topic, this crucial Handbook will be an important read for scholars of critical management studies, public administration, and public policy. It will additionally benefit researchers within the philanthropic studies field hoping to gain insight into the future of their discipline.

Below, we feature chapters from the volume authored by some of our NACC member representatives, highlighting their contributions to this publication. We would also like to share that in addition to editing the volume, Dr. Mirabella also co-authored a chapter, “Neocolonialism’s Perpetuation of Institutional Life of Disabled Individuals through the Rhetoric of Philanthropy and Charity,” with her daughter, Katherine Prendella (Doctoral Student, Rutgers-New Brunswick).

The Nature of Critical Global Civil Society Scholarship: Reviewing the State of the Art 1972-2021
Angela M. Eikenberry, Jennifer Dodge, and Tracey M. Coule

This chapter examines global civil society scholarship published in three key field journals—Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, and Voluntas—with particular attention to the most critical work originating from or focusing on countries outside the more commonly studied (“Western,” white) Anglosphere and European context. The 65 articles identified converge around two major areas: problematizing meanings of civil society concepts and practices, and problematizing assumptions about relationships. Within these themes, scholars emphasize the importance of context and political economy; societal transformation and development, democratization, and emancipation; and debates about what is the best way to study civil society in ways that uphold epistemic justice —a global South-informed unified approach, or a more contextualized country or region approach. Finally, it is noted that articles still seemed limited in their use of epistemologies and theories from parts of the world outside of the Anglosphere and Europe.

Decolonizing Nonprofit, NGO, and Development Higher Education: Valuing Indigenous Knowledge in the Majority World
Roseanne M. Mirabella, Heather Carpenter, and Ibrahim Shafau

This chapter challenges the hegemony of the Minority World over higher education institutions (HEIs) in the Minority World and proposes recommendations to decommodify higher education, refocus curricula and pedagogical approaches to challenge global inequities and neocolonial domination, empower communities to resist hegemonic discourses, and remove the veil of cultural blindness. By reviewing the major influences on HEIs generally and the application of these discourses in the case of nonprofit and nongovernmental organization education particularly, the authors highlight the ways in which future nonprofit and nongovernmental organization leaders are steeped in the language of development, development theory, and development studies, further solidifying the grip of the Minority World on the Majority World. They provide alternative structures and processes to challenge and reconfigure Minority World hegemonic practices underscoring the value of alternative frames that prioritize voices, perspectives, and understandings of stakeholders from the Majority World.

The Racialization of Philanthropic and Nonprofit Organizations: A Critical Analysis of White Supremacy and Economic Injustice in the Sector
Angela R. Logan and Maureen Emerson Feit

Philanthropic organizations, and the nonprofits that rely on philanthropic giving, are built upon a vast and persistent racial wealth gap in the United States. In this chapter, the authors call for intentional and sustained attention to intersections of race and class in the dynamics between organized philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Combining scholarship on elite philanthropy with critical theories of structural racism, they argue that systems of unearned white advantage have simultaneously fueled organized philanthropy and muted the philanthropic contributions of communities of color. They examine how interactions between organized philanthropy and nonprofits facilitate the racialization of these organizations as spaces that center the interests of white donors and encourage the reproduction and reinforcement of racial inequality in core functions of nonprofits. Finally, they consider the implications of the perpetuation of white supremacy in the sector and offer avenues for transformation in policy, research, and practice.

Burn it to the Ground: Queer Theory, (Hetero)normativities, and Binaries in Nonprofit Organizations
Seth J. Meyer, Elizabeth J. Dale, and Kareem K. M. Willis

In this chapter the authors use queer theory, a critical theory that questions heteronormative understandings of society, to challenge normalized definitions and concepts in nonprofit organizations. They advance alternative and arguably more emancipatory interpretations of nonprofit organizations by ‘queering’ some of the traditional binaries that structure how we organize and operate nonprofit organizations and their work. They begin by queering the definition of what constitutes a nonprofit organization and discuss how compulsory heterosexuality manifests in organizations. They critically investigate four binaries, including the relationship between donors and beneficiaries, funders and grantors, employees and clients, and the organization and community, and argue for more fluid, power-sharing relationships. Throughout their analysis, they show how queer theory can be integrated into nonprofit scholarship and generate new questions with which to investigate the nonprofit sector.

Neocolonialism’s Perpetuation of Institutional Life of Disabled Individuals through the Rhetoric of Philanthropy and Charity
Kate Prendella and Roseanne M. Mirabella

This chapter utilizes critical disability theory, voluntourism studies, and neocolonial theory to discuss how the actions of philanthropists and nonprofit organizations from the Minority World have perpetuated the global marginalization and displacement of children, particularly disabled children. Tying the resurgence of orphanages to recolonization, the authors explore the role of these neoliberal institutions as sites of violence towards and control of disabled bodies. They explore the ways in which the charity rhetoric of disability popularized through media intersects with and abets the orphanage industrial complex supported by and dependent upon voluntourism, describing the ways in which the orphan tourism industry depends upon the exploitation of children to fuel its financial needs. Recognizing the toll that this system exacts on children, particularly children with disabilities, they end with a call for recognition and action to challenge and demolish this system of oppression and stigmatization centering the needs of children in this discourse.

Roseanne M. Mirabella, Ph.D. is member of the faculty of the College of Business and Public Management at Kean University. She conducts research on philanthropy and nonprofit and nongovernmental education and critical perspectives on nonprofit organizing. She has authored or co-authored many papers on nonprofit and nongovernment organization education and one co-edited book “Reframing Nonprofit Organizations: Democracy, Inclusion and Social Change” exploring the ways in which nonprofit management education programs can prepare students both to lead organizations as well as for their important role as advocates for the communities they serve. She is co-editor of the recently published Handbook of Critical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action one of the first major surveys of critical scholarship within the field. She is past President of ARNOVA and the New Jersey Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) and is currently a member of the leadership team of the Critical Perspectives Section of ARNOVA.

Dr. Angela M. Eikenberry is Professor and Director in the School of Public Policy (SPP) at the University of Connecticut. Her research focuses on the social, economic and political roles of philanthropy, voluntary associations, and nonprofit organizations in democratic governance. Empirical and theoretical areas of research include giving circles and collaborative giving, marketization of nonprofit organizations and philanthropy, social enterprise, democracy and social equity/justice areas related to nonprofits/philanthropy, and critical social theories.

Dr. Eikenberry’s work appears in dozens of peer-reviewed books, journal articles and book chapters and has been featured on NPR’s All Things Considered and The Takeaway, and in the Stanford Social Innovation Review. Her book, Giving Circles: Philanthropy, Voluntary Association, Democracy won CASE’s John Grenzebach Research Award for Outstanding Research in Philanthropy. She also received a Fulbright Scholar Award to conduct research on giving circles in the UK, the University of Nebraska at Omaha campus-wide Awards for Distinguished Research or Creative Activity and Outstanding Graduate Mentor, and the 2023 NVSQ Best Paper Award. She is past President of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA) and a fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration.

Before coming to UConn SPP, Dr. Eikenberry was a Professor serving in several leadership positions at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, including as Chair of the School of Public Administration doctoral program and President and Grievance Officer of the UNO AAUP. She also helped found and run the nonprofit organization, Mode Shift Omaha.

Angela R. Logan, Ph.D. is an Associate Teaching Professor and the St. Andre Bessette Academic Director of the Master of Nonprofit Administration in the Mendoza College of Business at the University of Notre Dame. In her role as Academic Director, she provides leadership to the team that oversees both formats of the Master of Nonprofit Administration degree, and as a member of the College’s Department of Management and Organization, she teaches core courses for both programs as well. Professor Logan’s honors and distinctions include the inaugural Notre Dame Faculty Black Excellence Award (2023) and the MNAR Outstanding Professor Award (2023). Prior to joining the College in 2013, Angela has over 25 years of experience in higher education and philanthropy, with a particular focus in the areas of education and diversity. Over the course of her career, she has served as the Program Officer for Education at The Harvest Foundation (Martinsville, VA), the Director of the Bonner Scholars Program at Oberlin College (Oberlin, OH), and the Director of Multicultural Affairs and the Admissions Counselor / Coordinator of Multicultural Admissions at Defiance College (Defiance, OH). Her research focuses on the intersection of gender, race, faith, and nonprofit and philanthropic leadership.

Dr. Heather Carpenter is a highly networked nonprofit professor, researcher, consultant, and trainer passionate about nonprofit capacity building and talent development. She has served as a nonprofit professor and academic program director for over ten years and a nonprofit leader for over 20 years. She serves as Executive Director of the Institute for Nonprofit Administration and Research at LSU Shreveport. INAR’s mission is to conduct research and disseminate knowledge about nonprofit organizations. It has three programmatic areas: academics, professional development, and research.

She has published numerous academic journal articles and books. She previously served as co-editor and chief of the Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership was on the board of the Nonprofit Academic Centers Council the national accrediting body for nonprofit academic degree programs from 2017-2023. In 2022, the Nonprofit Times selected Dr. Carpenter as a Top 50 Power and Influence Nonprofit Leader.

Dr. Carpenter is a lifetime member of Girl Scouts, active in the Downtown Shreveport Rotary Club, and serves on the advisory committee for the Greater Shreveport Chamber of Commerce Leadership Program. She was recently named to the Volunteer Louisiana Commission by the Governor, the state service commission that has a mission to “Strength Louisiana communities through volunteerism and national service.” Her husband is a Navy Veteran and Captain at Spirit Airlines, and they have a 13-year-old daughter.

She earned her Ph.D. in Leadership Studies with an emphasis on Nonprofit and Philanthropic Leadership from the University of San Diego and a Master of Management in Nonprofit Administration from North Park University in Chicago, Illinois.

Elizabeth J. Dale, Ph.D. is program director and associate professor in Nonprofit Leadership at Seattle University. A former development director and Certified Fund Raising Executive (CFRE), her research interests include social justice philanthropy, giving among women and LGBTQ+ donors, and the intersection of gender and philanthropy. She has presented her research nationally and internationally and has provided commentary for The New York Times, Forbes, Bloomberg, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, and The Guardian. She completed her Ph.D. in Philanthropic Studies at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. She also holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism and women’s and gender studies from Ohio Wesleyan University and a master’s degree in women’s studies from The Ohio State University.

By |2024-10-17T09:58:32-04:00October 10th, 2024|NACC Member Research|

A Message from Your Board President: April 2024

Angela R. Logan, NACC President
Angela R. Logan, PhD

Angela R. Logan, PhD
St. Andre Bessette Academic Director,
Master of Nonprofit Administration

Associate Teaching Professor,
Mendoza College of Business
University of Notre Dame

Spring is in the Air

Hello! The calendar says it’s Spring in the Northern Hemisphere. In the northwest corner of Indiana, that can only mean one thing: I am simultaneously dealing with high pollen count days and freeze warning nights! LOL!

In all seriousness, it’s also a great time in the life of our programs: Commencement season is upon! We get to witness the time-honored tradition of the culmination of all the blood, sweat, and tears we have endured right alongside our students to get them to this point! We welcome the newest members of Nu Lambda Mu, and meet the loved ones of our students. Faculty promotions and teaching awards are also announced, and we are recognized by our students and institutions for our commitment and dedication.

For me, Spring is also a time of reflection and renewal. As a new homeowner, that means I’ve been thinking a lot lately about planting flowers, building container gardens, and welcoming slower days and patio nights. In the Christian tradition, we speak of “seed-time-harvest.” As the granddaughter of a farmer and a gardener, I learned early that you should not expect to see peppers the day or even the week after you plant them. Good things take time, attention, and care.

Our work in nonprofit and philanthropic education is no different: when our students come to us, we cannot expect them to understand de Tocqueville at Orientation. It takes time, attention, and care to get them to understand the “Four-Legged Stool of Fundraising” or how Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need impacts volunteerism. We teach our students that cultivating donors requires “seed-time-harvest:” rarely do major gifts precede annual gifts.

Good things take time, attention, and care … especially us! I hope in this season of celebration and renewal, you are able to give yourself the time, attention, and care you need to flourish and bloom! Right now, that means I’m going to sit on the deck and enjoy the sun!

Congratulations: we survived another academic year! Go get some sun!

All the best,

Angela R. Logan
Board President, NACC

By |2024-04-22T13:02:10-04:00April 22nd, 2024|President's Message|

Greetings from the Executive Director: March 2024

Nicole Collier, NACC Executive Director

Nicole Collier, MPSA
Executive Director, NACC
Center for Nonprofits and Philanthropy
Bush School of Government and Public Service
Texas A&M University

Well, I have discovered a new form of anxiety…having to follow Angela Logan’s newsletter articles.

I hope you are all having an excellent spring! It’s hard to believe spring classes are almost done here in College Station. My brain still thinks it’s recovering from winter break!

I have been pretty busy the past few months. The Center for Nonprofits & Philanthropy at Texas A&M, where I dedicate the rest of my work time, hosted its first Nonprofit BRIDGE Conference. The conference was dedicated to fostering partnerships between nonprofit organizations and higher education institutions. I saw many familiar faces there, including several NACC members based in Texas. It was a great event and I’m looking forward to future conferences.

Now that I am done with that conference and can take a deep breath, it’s time to return to several NACC projects and initiatives. It’s time to send the updated curricular guidelines to an editor and printer. We need to continue welcoming applicants of Nu Lambda Mu through the rest of the application cycle. Finally, it’s time to start planning our summer 2025 conference! It’s going to be a busy year, but I can’t wait to dig back in.

I’ll keep it short and sweet this month. I look forward to sharing more. Until then, please don’t hesitate to reach out!

All the best,
Nicole

By |2024-03-25T09:04:37-04:00March 25th, 2024|Executive Director's Report|

The Nonprofit Open Data Collective

Dr. Nathan Grasse, Carleton University
Dr. Nathan Grasse

Dr. Nathan Grasse
Associate Professor
School of Public Policy & Administration
Carleton University

The Nonprofit Open Data Collective

The Nonprofit Open Data Collective is an evolving collaboration between academics, think tanks, and industry experts to promote open data in the sector, with members from sector leaders, including Cinthia Schuman of the Aspen Institute, and academic institutions, including Jesse Lecy of Arizona State University.

Members such as the Aspen Institute and Independent Sector have engaged to improve the data environment, including 990 data and the availability of electronically filed records, as well as working with administrators in the Internal Revenue Service and Bureau of Labor Statistics. They have also worked with institutions such as the Johnson Center to gather evidence on the impact of open data and useful data practices (e.g., electronic tax filing).

Globally there are dozens of administrative or research databases to track third-sector organizations. This data is sometimes released in formats that are not always easy to use – ASCII text, Javascript object notation (JSON), and extensible markup language (XML) files. This can be a barrier to those hoping to learn about the sector.

Academic members of the collective created a GitHub organization to make data more accessible to scholars and researchers. The website includes scripts to download, clean, and process data, research-ready datasets, tools for analysis, and links to other resources. These might be helpful to NACC members who wish to integrate sector data into their courses or those looking to utilize data in their research, and the collective would welcome contributions from NACC scholars.

Partner Organizations

NODC Partner Organization logos

Nathan Grasse is an Associate Professor of nonprofit finance and financial management, governance and leadership, and strategic management at Carleton University. His research focuses on the governance of public-serving organizations, including associations between governance and financial management. This includes the study of revenue structures, the potential conditioning effects of organizational and environmental factors, and the implications of strategic choices on financial health and other organizational outcomes.

By |2023-05-25T10:17:54-04:00May 22nd, 2023|NACC Member Research|

2023 Conference Schedule

2023
Conference Schedule

This page will be continually updated as the conference approaches. More specific details about rooms for each session, etc, will be added shortly before the conference.

A PDF version of the printed program is available here.

Wednesday, July 19
Arrival Day

9:00 AM to 12:00 PM

NACC Board of Directors Meeting (room to be announced closer to date)

12:00 PM to 1:30 PM

1:30 to 5:00 PM

These groups are open to all, but you can help us prepare for the best sessions possible by completing the RSVP form here.

Group A: Continuing Education in Third Sector Higher Education Programs

Group B: Social Justice and Supporting Historically Marginalized Communities in our Communities and the Classroom

Group C: Recruitment and Marketing for Nonprofit & Philanthropic Education Programs

Group D: Emerging Leadership in Nonprofit & Philanthropic Education Programs

6:00 PM to 8:30 PM

Welcome Reception | Legacy Ballroom II

Hors d’oeuvres and a cash bar will be available

Thursday, July 20
Conference Programming Day One

8:00 AM to 9:00 AM

9:00 AM to 10:30 AM

Welcome and Opening Plenary | Auditorium

10:45 AM to 12:00 PM

Session One

Session 1- | Terrace I

Heather Carpenter
Institute for Nonprofit Administration and Research, Louisiana State University Shreveport

Brittany Spillman, Ed.D.
Director of Community and Collegiate Programs
Cary Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies
College of Human Sciences-Auburn University

Jeff Brasher
Council Executive, Boy Scouts Norwella Council
MSNPA Student, LSU Shreveport

(more…)

By |2023-07-20T07:47:06-04:00May 4th, 2023|

NACC Black Lives Matter Statement

NACC Black Lives Matter Statement

The recent murders of African-Americans at the hands of the police and others in the USA have yet again brought the issue of race relations and the long history of injustice to the fore. If anything good is to come of this, we – as individuals and as an organization – must take this opportunity to reflect on where we stand and what we can do to address racism, bias and inequities.

NACC, an international membership association of academic centers, urges all members in the USA and elsewhere to use the months and years ahead to investigate our research and teaching to better understand where our biases are and where we have failed. The nonprofit organizations we serve and study are critical to the development and strengthening of democracy and civil society. Universities are central institutions for understanding and promoting the structures essential for democratic life. However, universities and the sector mirror society and contain the same endemic inequities. Our research continues to emphasize white, male philanthropy.

NACC itself has a decidedly mixed record. We only have to look at our membership and at the attendees at our meetings and conferences to see the evident truth. We are overwhelmingly white. We are primarily female. Almost exclusively, white males hold the senior positions in our own organization and in our member organizations.

One “excuse” we use is that we reflect the biases and inequities of the field we work in. We cannot hide behind that anymore. Another “excuse” is that we are going through a generational change, as the newer generation of emerging leaders better reflects the wide range of our society. If that is true, how can we push that change to occur faster?

As an organization, we commit to incorporating new content into the NACC Curricular Guidelines that will help nonprofit academic programs institute anti-racist curricula on their campuses.  We must remember that our students look to us for guidance on how to make the world a better place. The world is calling our graduates to fix the systemic problem of racism with protest, policy, programming, and with compassion.

But it’s not just about the curriculum content we recommend to member colleges and universities ; it’s about faculty members, administrators, and NACC itself. We commit to being an anti-racist organization. Over the last year, the NACC board went through a much-needed inclusion and diversity training. From this we created a series of working groups for improving NACC. These working groups have defined a number of important objectives including: revamping our communications to ensure greater participation by all members; instituting a new system of committee and board member recruitment that pushes us to incorporate a more diverse leadership; and, establishing a bias check function for our meetings and conferences.

The horrific incidents in Minnesota and elsewhere have placed an even greater sense of urgency on NACC to implement these and other improvements. Like many institutions in academia, NACC is a work in progress and there is much work to be done.

We welcome your suggestions and experiences in this journey forward.

Yours in solidarity,

The Nonprofit Academic Centers Council Board of Directors

By |2021-01-04T22:13:11-05:00January 4th, 2021|

Accreditation Timeline

NACC Accreditation Process

NACC Accreditation fosters third sector academic programs worldwide, including nonprofit and nongovernmental studies and management, social entrepreneurship, social-purpose organizations leadership, and philanthropy studies and management, all with curriculum that places the civil sector at the center of the curricular perspective.

Accreditation Timeline

Applications are accepted on a rolling basis. The following timeline is for illustrative purposes only.

  • January 31: Suggested deadline to submit Initial application and application fee.
  • January 31 to February 28: Interviews (Section 2) completed. Section 3 made available to applicant immediately following completion of interview.
  • February 29: Deadline to submit Section 3. This concludes the application process.
  • March 15: Accreditation Team to provides Preliminary Reports to ERB for their review and approval.
  • March 30: Preliminary Reports sent to respective Applicants for their review and response.
  • April 15: Deadline for Applicant to submit response to Preliminary Report to Accreditation Team.
  • June 1: Accreditation Team announces ERB’s final decisions to respective Applicants.
  • June 30: Hard copy reports sent to participating Institutions
  • August 30: Accreditation Team produces Health of the Field report based on Accreditation findings.

By |2022-10-07T21:36:42-04:00June 21st, 2019|

NACC News: March 2019

READ THE FULL ISSUE HERE

In this issue

  • Once Upon a Time…. | Elizabeth Boris  | Data Collection, Form 990, Discussion and Collaboration
  • Message From the President | Matt Hale
  • Greetings From the Executive Director | Erin Vokes
  • On My Mind | Patsy Kraeger |Trust in Institutions
  • Board Perspective | Angela Logan | Another Look at the Administration vs. Research Conundrum
  • Accreditation Report | Stuart Mendel
  • NACC 2019 Biennial Conference
  • Nu Lambda Mu
    • Emily Johnson | Hamline University
    • Kimberly Stuart | University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
  • Membership News
    • University of Southern California | Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy
    • Arizona State University | Lodestar Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Innovation
    • University of Central Florida | Center for Public and Nonprofit Management
    • Indiana University  | Lilly Family School of Philanthropy
    • Lindenwood University | Nonprofit Administration Program
    • Denver University \ Welcome a New Member

Continue Reading »

By |2019-05-21T14:10:00-04:00May 21st, 2019|News|

Curricular Guidelines

The NACC Curricular Guidelines

NACC Curricular Guidelines provide model curriculum for degrees in nonprofit leadership, nonprofit organization management, nonprofit sector studies and philanthropy.

2025 Curricular Guidelines by Center For Nonprofits & Philanthropy

View the Curricular Guidelines

Third Revised Edition 2015
(Graduate guidelines)

Second Revised Edition 2015
(Undergraduate guidelines)

NACC Curricular Guidelines, Fourth Revised Edition – Coming Soon!

As the fast-evolving field of nonprofit and philanthropy pedagogy deepens and the institutional delivery knowledge diversifies, our vision is that the academy and the field of nonprofit sector practice will innovate using the curricular topics and framework provided in the NACC Curricular Guidelines.

In reflecting on NACC’s dual mission of serving its members and advancing the field, it is clear to the organization’s leadership that the value of the curricular guidelines is indisputable; the need to update the documents, and revise them is essential as the fields of study continue to evolve. To that end, NACC is once again embarking on a “Curriculum Revision Project,” with a dedicated committee leading the effort. As with past efforts in revising the guidelines, this Fourth Revised Edition (Graduate guidelines) and Third Revised Edition (Undergraduate guidelines) will utilize a crowd-source process. Guided by the NACC Board of Directors, widespread input will be sought from informed academics and practitioners through a web-platform and survey.

See some of the most recent revision documents here:

The formal study of the nonprofit sector, philanthropy, private organizations of civil society and the institutions of voluntarism around the globe has surpassed its fifth decade. Throughout these years, the steady march toward an independent field of pedagogy has given us a string of important benchmarks.

These include the founding of NACC in the early 1990s, and NACC’s creation of the original set of curricular guidelines for graduate and undergraduate study in nonprofit leadership, the nonprofit sector and philanthropy.

Building upon the work of the early and middle 2000s, input for these guidelines included the NACC constellation of institutional members, but also involved input from a much broader community of theory and practice experts. This third revision of the graduate curricular guidelines and this second revision of the undergraduate curricular guidelines reflect the cumulative pedagogy of formal and informal learning contributed by our members and the larger sphere of nonprofit sector stakeholders.

Among the salient changes in both the graduate and undergraduate guidelines are topical categories involving the expansion of technology in the field and in course delivery, more pronounced global and international perspectives, an accentuation of social innovation and social enterprise content areas, to name a few.

As the fast evolving field of nonprofit and philanthropy pedagogy deepens and the institutional delivery knowledge diversifies, our vision is that the academy and the field of nonprofit sector practice will innovate using the curricular topics and framework provided in these guidelines. From the benefit of experience drawn from multiple iterations of NACC’s curricular guidelines, we urge users in the U.S. and around the world, to approach these revisions as guidelines to help in the development of courses, programs and degrees.

Clearly, for those of us who study, teach, perform research and work in the nonprofit sector, the benchmarks offer indication that the time for a “nonprofit/philanthropy first” perspective of the discipline is upon us. To that end, we hope you will find the guidelines useful in your work. Please continue to assist us through broad dissemination of these guidelines and by helping to inform future guidelines. We anticipate more frequent revisions of these guidelines made possible through real-time opportunities to share your recommendations through a NACC web portal developed for such a purpose.

NACC is a membership association comprised of academic centers and/or programs at accredited colleges and universities that are devoted to the study of the nonprofit/nongovernmental sector, philanthropy and voluntary action to advance education, research, and practice that increase the nonprofit sector’s ability to enhance civic engagement, democracy, and human welfare. Given its mission, it is appropriate that NACC’s leaders have continued to advance comprehensive curricular guidelines to assist its members and build the field.

NACC’s leadership in developing and disseminating curricular guidelines began in 2001, made possible thanks to the generous financial support of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. As a result of extensive discussions from a variety of scholars and practitioners, led by a NACC appointed task force, the first-ever graduate guidelines were released in 2003. The initial graduate guidelines were immediately well received and prompted a call for NACC to continue evolving such guidelines to include not only subsequent revisions of the graduate document, but also for the development of undergraduate guidelines. Again, a task force was appointed and, in 2007, the second edition of the graduate guidelines and the first edition of undergraduate guidelines were released. As before, the documents were well received and their release coincided with the continued explosive growth of nonprofit education programs around the United States and across the world.

In evaluating NACC’s dual mission of serving its members and advancing the field(s) it was clear to the organization’s leadership in 2013–2104, that the value of the curricular guidelines is indisputable; the need to update the documents, and revise them is essential as the fields of study continue to evolve. To that end, NACC’s board authorized a “Curriculum Revision Project” and Robert Ashcraft of Arizona State University, was recruited to chair the effort. Unlike prior methods used for developing and revising the guidelines, involving a defined task force assembled for such purposes, this most recent effort utilized a crowd-source process. Guided by the NACC Board of Directors, widespread input was sought from informed academics and practitioners through a web-platform and survey, launched in August 2014. In edition, input was solicited through special NACC sessions established at the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA, arnova.org) and the International Society for Third-Sector Research (ISTR, istr.org) conferences held during the 2013 and 2014 years, respectively. Following a vetting and review process, NACC’s board adopted the revised guidelines at its board meeting in June 2015.

Since its beginning in 1991, NACC remains steadfast in its support of centers and programs that provide education and research about, and academically based services for, the nonprofit/nongovernmental sector and philanthropy. NACC’s desire is for these curricular guidelines to be actively used as academic programs continue to evolve.

By |2025-07-09T09:23:19-04:00January 20th, 2019|

Publication Opportunities

Publication Opportunities

As a benefit to members, NACC posts Calls for Papers and other publication opportunities. Links stay active for 30 days at which point they will be removed. Members can resubmit postings upon expiration of the 30-day period. Please note that the date the call is posted refers to the date the call was added to the Publication Opportunities webpage.

NACC News

If you have a story to share for inclusion in a monthly publication of NACC News, please send your article to our Editor, Linda Serra, at lindalserra@gmail.com.

View NACC News here.


Journal of Nonprofit Education & Leadership (JNEL)

NACC is proud to endorse our partner journal, the Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership. This quarterly journal’s mission is to improve nonprofit education and leadership through the publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed manuscripts centered on professional practice, research, and theoretical discussions. Manuscript submissions are encouraged from authors inside and outside of academia.

The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership publishes quality manuscripts to disseminate the latest knowledge related to nonprofit education and leadership to help develop theory and practice. The journal seeks quantitative and/or qualitative research findings; conceptual or theoretical discussions; or program best practices.

Relevant topic areas (centered on nonprofit education and leadership) for the journal include, but are not limited to: nonprofit governance, fundraising, volunteer management, operations, legal framework, philanthropy, program planning, implementation and evaluation, and financial management.

The journal provides a forum for authors interested in nonprofit education and nonprofit leadership to exchange information via quality, peer-reviewed articles. This exchange is designed to advance theory and improve practice.

Learn more about the journal and publication opportunities here:
https://js.sagamorepub.com/jnel


Nonprofit Policy Forum (NPF)

Call for Papers 2018
Nonprofit Policy Forum is a double-blind refereed international journal that publishes original research and analysis on public policy issues and the public policy process critical to the work of nonprofit organizations and social enterprises. It serves as a forum and authoritative and accessible source of information, for scholars, leaders, and policy-makers worldwide. A primary goal of NPF is to provide nonprofit and social enterprise leaders and policy-makers with readily accessible and relevant scholarly research. NPF seeks to contribute to the development of the field of nonprofit related policy research, to more clearly define the role of the sector in the policy and advocacy process, and to build a stronger research base on public policy and nonprofit and social enterprise organizations. NPFis published by De Gruyter, Inc. and is in its 9th year of publication. The journal is published in Open Access format and is fully available at www.degruyter.com/loi/npf. Open Access is made possible through a grant from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundations and the institutional sponsors of NPF: The Humphrey School of the University of Minnesota, The Urban Institute, the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA) and the Stockholm Center for Civil Society Studies. NPF’s editorial board consists of leading scholars from 20 different countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and Australia.

NPF welcomes unsolicited manuscripts year-round. The journal strives for quality, relevance, and originality, and encourages contributions from all scholarly disciplines and all parts of the world. Articles should be written in English for a general audience, not a particular discipline. Content should address policy issues affecting nonprofit organizations and social enterprises in general or in particular subfields, the involvement of nonprofits in the policy process, the historical development of nonprofit-related policy issues, or analysis of policy proposals and alternatives affecting nonprofit organizations and social enterprises and the fields in which they are active.

Subject areas include but are not limited to analysis and evaluation of tax policies, regulatory policies, national security policy and civil liberties, policy advocacy and lobbying, government funding of nonprofit organizations, the role of faith-based institutions in service delivery, church and state relations, disaster relief policy, the role of nonprofits in economic and community development, alternative organizational arrangements for nonprofit and social enterprise activity, and public policy issues in specific sub-fields such as health care, social justice, the environment, education and the arts, especially where they have general implications for the nonprofit sector and social enterprise as a whole.

Overall, NPF seeks analyses of current public policy issues, the historical development of public policies affecting nonprofits in various countries, and the practical implications of existing policies for the operations, performance, and social impact of nonprofit organizations and social enterprises.

Review Process

Articles are reviewed on the basis of substance, methodology, originality, acknowledgment of the literature, and relevance to NPF’s readership. Submissions are peer-reviewed in a double-blind process by multiple reviewers with expertise in the topic and relevant disciplines. The review process is structured to provide authors with a rapid response and constructive feedback. Criteria for acceptance include conciseness, clarity of presentation, and general readability.

Contents

In addition to regular research-based articles, NPF welcomes special features including interviews, book reviews, case studies, and policy briefings.

Research-based Articles

  • Articles of approximately 5,000 words reporting original research and analysis on policy-relevant topics of interest to nonprofit policymakers, nonprofit practitioners, social entrepreneurs, and scholars

Special Features—articles of 2,500 words or less as follows:

  • Interviews with policy leaders
  • Book Reviews of the current nonprofit public policy related literature
  • Case Studies of policy developments
  • Policy Briefings of recent legislation, administrative reports, judicial hearings, research reports, task forces, and other relevant documents and proceedings

How to Submit a Manuscript

Papers may be submitted directly to our submission site: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/dgnpf.

Style

A fundamental purpose of NPF is to promote effective communication among researchers, policy-makers, and nonprofit leaders, appealing to a broad audience. Jargon is avoided and technical terms should be explained in non-technical language. Further information on manuscript preparation is available on the website.

Editorial Board

Editor-in-Chief
Dennis Young, Georgia State University (emeritus)

Managing Editor
Linda Serra, Independent Consultant

Senior Editorial Board
Alan J. Abramson, George Mason University
Helmut Anheier, Hertie School of Governance, Berlin
Andrea Bassi, University of Bologna
Elizabeth T. Boris, The Urban Institute
Gemma Donnelly-Cox, Trinity College, Dublin
Philippe Eynaud, Sorbonne Graduate Business School, France
James Ferris, University of Southern California
Benjamin Gidron, College of Management Academic Studies, Israel
Virginia A. Hodgkinson, Georgetown University (retired)
Kevin Kearns, University of Pittsburgh
Eliza Lee, Hong Kong University
Michael Meyer, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Myles McGregor-Lowndes, Queensland University of Technology
Marta Reuter, Stockholm University
Mark Rosenman, Union Institute and University (emeritus)
James Allen Smith, The Rockefeller Archive Center
Melissa Stone, University of Minnesota
Isabel Vidal, University of Barcelona
Filip Wijkstrom, Stockholm School of Economics
Naoto Yamauchi, Osaka University


Journal of Ideology (JOI)

The Journal of Ideology (JOI) is a juried interdisciplinary publication intended to serve as a forum of critical high quality scholarly research and theory development. The JOI will encourage publication of essays that promote innovations of ideology that run counter to conventional theory and premises across the social sciences. An acceptable perspective of authors would be that the minority view in a debate of a particular field, discipline, or issue offers a reasonable starting point for discourse.

Submission Guidelines
Because of the counterpoint nature of the JOI content, authors are expected to represent conventional ideology as reflected in the literature of the field. Authors are asked to note that the JOI solicits essays for consideration from across the spectrum of social science, humanities, and applied professions disciplines, and that readers may be unfamiliar with the conventional theory they are attempting to challenge. Hence, vigorous juried review will focus on clarity and logic of argument, and authors are directed to provide space in each submission to articulate the theory and its adherents that are addressed by the counter theory.

Submissions to the JOI cannot be under consideration for other publication in other outlets, and previously copyrighted materials are not acceptable submissions. The Journal of Ideology editors reserve the right to decline to consider or reject submissions for any reason they determine, including inconsistency with the guidelines, purposes, and/or principles of the editors, the journal board of associate editors, sponsoring institutions, and partners.

Submitted materials must be prepared in a manner allowing for blind review, although authors are encouraged to identify a scholarly discipline so that materials may be reviewed by peers generally familiar with the subject matter. They are also encouraged to self-identify an institutional role such as faculty/student collaboration originating in applied research projects or thought exercises based in theoretical inquiry.

Formatting Requirements
Format for the essay are as follows:

  • Papers are limited to 25 pages, double spaced, 12 point font in either Cambria, Calibri, or Times New Roman typeface.
  • Citations should be listed according to APA format. References should be listed single spaced. References do not count toward the 25 page limit.
  • Authors may include footnotes for explanatory purposes.
  • Authors are asked to use major and minor headers.
  • Authors are asked to accurately align Abstract content to clearly reflect the purpose and points of the essay.

Learn more about the journal or submit a paper here:
https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ji/

By |2019-01-20T19:59:51-05:00January 18th, 2019|
Go to Top